25 Jun 2021
ICOS Reaction to CAP Agreement: Commercial Farming Loses in Agreed Payment Reallocation
The reallocation of CAP funding disadvantages commercial farms, many of whom are already struggling with increasing regulatory cost and takes further funding away from those under the greatest pressure to invest further in climate and environmental actions
The level of flexibility to manage unspent eco-scheme money risks potential loss of CAP funds
25 June: The Irish Co-operative Organisation (ICOS) welcomes today the announcement that an agreement has been reached on the main issues within the CAP reform negotiations. The Society however is disappointed to see that the agreement includes a minimum 85% internal convergence and a 10% redistributive payment requirement.
Commenting on the deal, ICOS President Jerry Long stated; “The negotiations and discussions concerning the agreement and implementation of the new CAP have been ongoing for the past number of years, and given the need to provide certainty regarding the requirements and supports to farmers, today’s agreement is to be welcomed.
“While we are happy to see progress, we are however disappointed that the agreement includes a minimum 85% internal convergence and a 10% redistributive payment requirement. As such, we reiterate our concern that this significant reallocation of CAP funding disadvantages productive farms, most of which have made extensive investments based on the current payment entitlements and which are already struggling with increasing costs of regulatory compliance.
“It is commercial dairy, tillage and drystock farmers who are losing out from this agreement, which fails to take into account the cost intensive nature of their operations (incurred by specific demands concerning traceability, hygiene etc.). These are the farmers who are driving our export industry, and who are reinvesting in jobs and infrastructure in our rural communities. The CAP payments made to those farmers have a multiplier effect in their community and this decision on reallocation will have knock-on economic implications on our rural economies.
“We are waiting for clarity now as to whether in an Irish context the implementation of 85% internal convergence covers the 10% redistributive payment requirement or whether further measures will be required and therefore just what the full implications of this will be.
“Furthermore, while the 25% ringfencing of eco-schemes which looks to be included within the agreement is unsurprising, the level of flexibility for unspent funds is. Despite the extent of the unknowns in the content or operation of these schemes a very minimum degree of flexibility will be possible to manage unspent funds, with a floor of 20% set for the first two years and just 2% flexibility possible from thereon, which will not ease fears that funding will be lost from the CAP as a result. It is therefore of absolute importance that these schemes are accessible and practical to all farmers, to avoid this situation of lost funds. What we do welcome within the agreement is the flexibility introduced within the text regarding GAEC 9, an environmental requirement regarding a minimum share of agricultural land to be devoted to non-productive features, and the recognition it provides for permanent grassland, which we expect and hope to be applicable in an Irish context.” Jerry Long concluded